The dynamic range is excellent, further improved compared to the Mark III, the ISO hold is very good but I expected a little more both at low and high ISO, also the RAW file is slightly softer and requires more work in post-production to revive it. I did not tolerate the lack of digital video stabilizer, present instead on 6D Mark II, too bad because the video department is certainly good also taking into account the Canon log. The burst of 7 fps is enough in an all-rounder like her, as well as the autofocus more than good even for sports. You have to learn to use it to the fullest, it has many functions, especially on autofocus, which allow the professional and the advanced amateur to always be able to set everything to the best, with the advantage of having an intuitive, accessible and practical menu, and of course many dedicated keys. Excellent optical viewfinder and excellent touch display, you work well, jpeg files are ready like this and RAW are well workable. The machine is solid and reliable, excellent in everything and versatile. Opinion: Finally I was able to combine the 80D with the much desired 5D Mark IV, an excellent SLR still today even if at least one stop back to the most recent Full Frame and Mirrorless as ISO seal, autofocus tracking, burst, operating speed and more. Pros: Excellent ergonomics, construction, tropicalization, menu, viewfinder, autofocus, dynamic range, resolution, display, battery, 4K, canon log, dual SD and CF slots, reliability.Ĭons: Lack of digital video stabilizer, ISO seal good but not in step, display not even partially adjustable, RAW slightly soft and requiring particular work in postproduction, perhaps the machine would have given the best of itself alongside the Digic 7 processor, marketed just after it. To sum up: in general positive judgment but requires considerable retouching. In these cases the results obtained were in accordance with expectations because I got some really nice raw files, only with some slight adjustments. So it gives the best of itself in the photography of subjects with homogeneous brightness or little contrast, such as inside museums and art galleries. Once the shadows have been arranged in some way, I have to intervene with a contrast mask to revive the image, and give body to the colors by acting on saturation. Sometimes, in these cases, the recovery takes place only partially and in particular the lightened shadows lose their original chromaticism, assuming unusual color. This requires quite a challenging recovery with Photoshop to make the chiaroscuro homogeneous. I observe that in landscape use it greatly accentuates the shadows, for example of the undergrowth, and at the same time increases the brightness of the light subjects. Opinion: I have owned the Canon 5D Mark IV for three years and I can say that I know it well enough to be able to make a judgment. Pros: Solidity of construction, reliability, in general sharpness of raw filesĬons: It accentuates too much the shadows that are often difficult to recover, churns out anonymous raw files, not at all incisive and devoid of bite. Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto ( info) Canon 5D Mark IV, acquista usato garantito su RCE Fotoįullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)Ĭanon EF (click here to view all compatible lenses)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |